Pictures of England

Search:

Historic Towns & Picturesque Villages

A picture of RyeBath AbbeyA picture of Bath AbbeyBag End?A picture of Barton Le ClayA picture of Barton Le Clay

Your thoughts on prayer

**Please support PoE by donating today - thank you**
 
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 12:23 on 5th September 2008
On 4th September 2008 23:59, Sue Gaffney-Ryder wrote:

John! I so totally disagree. WHY should you stop looking, wondering and growing because it is God's handiwork??? I do not understand that reasoning at all. Though man might never discover all the mysteries, God put into him an enquiring and intelligent mind. I love reading articles on how we are made, or about the earth and universe around us (not too deep, though....I gave up on the second chapter of A Short History Of Time). Truly I cannot see why there being a God who created all this should make one iota of difference to your quest for answers to how  and why  it all works.

What about Stonehenge and the Pyramids to name but a few. Historians and archaeologists do not stop studying and excavating these great wonders just because they know they were 'created'...constructed.. They continue to ask, how, and why they were created.         


Sue, imagine you were born in a different part of the universe - on a planet that orbits a red sun. Like millions of your ancestors, when you were a child you looked up and wondered why the sun was red. 

Your culture has an ancient book called 'The Secrets of the Universe'. Children are taught that the words in this book are not to be doubted: they were dictated by the Great Unicorn and they are true now, they always were true, and they always will be true. 

The book tells you that the sun is red because the Great Unicorn threw a red grape into the sky. It stayed there and since that day it has bathed the world in a wonderful red light. 

Now you have children of your own, and when they ask you why the sun is red you tell them about the grape. You don't need to learn anything about the life-cycle of stars - and neither do your children. You know why the sun is red. Why bother to look for other answers when you already have the one, true answer?
 
The reason there is so much conflict between science and religion can be found in the fact that scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief. Look at your reaction to Richard Dawkins - just the sight of his name is enough to make you refuse to read an article containing some of his thoughts. I'd be interested to know why you react that way. 
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 12:25 on 5th September 2008
On 5th September 2008 01:46, Wolf wrote:
John, if you enter this thread, check out the LINKS thread, it could be of interest.


Thanks for that, Wolf.

Poor old John Peel. 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Shirley K. Lawson
Shirley K. Lawson
Posts: 2310
Joined: 17th Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posted at 16:50 on 5th September 2008

I'm back for an bit....the article I mentioned prior can be found in the Kindred Spirit Magazine, Winter issue (DEC-FEb) 1995-6, ..the article is called Electro-crystal therapy...and it comes by way of an Harry Oldfied, whom runs The School of Elecrocrystal Therapy at 177 Long Drive, South Ruislip, Miidlesex HA4OHL .....I have no idea if the school exists yet or not, but go to the library near you and read this article Page 22.24. has color aura pictures with the article.  

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
editPosted at 22:21 on 5th September 2008

John, please explain what you mean when you say 'scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief'.

A few pages back I quoted a few words 'He is hanging the earth upon nothing'

Isaiah 40 v 22 says: He dwells enthroned above the circle/sphere/globe (different translations) of the earth.

Until about 3 or 4 hundred years ago, as you know, we thought the earth was flat and we might fall off the edge.

Now, how did these writers, three thousand years ago know the truth.

Richard Dawkins does not hide his contempt for believers of God. That is why I gave him a miss. He should try a bit of humility.

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 00:02 on 6th September 2008
John, please explain what you mean when you say 'scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief'. 
 
OK, Sue. Here are just a few of the religious dogmas Science has undermined. The church - kicking and screaming every step of the way - has eventually had to accept that every one of them is wrong.
  
  • The Earth is at the center of the Universe.
  • The Earth is the only object of its kind in the Universe,
  • The Sun is at the center of the Universe.
  • The Milky Way is the only galaxy in the Universe.
  • The Milky Way is at the center of the Universe.
  • Our Sun is the only star with planets.
  • Our Sun and planets have been in the universe since very near its beginning.
  • The velocity of the Earth in space constitutes an absolute frame of reference for the rest of the Universe.
  • Humans are different from other animals in that we were specially created by the Creator in His own image.
  • Humans have special immunity from the laws of nature.
  • Humans are different in kind from other animals:
 
 
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
editPosted at 00:19 on 6th September 2008

Oh John, I am not referring to things that have been naturally proved down the ages.

I should have made myself clearer: How does scientific investigation undermine the bible.

Now, please would you answer the questions I have asked in my last post. How did those writers three thousand years ago know the truth.

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
editPosted at 00:25 on 6th September 2008
Numbers 9 and 11 are most certainly correct.
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posted at 03:14 on 6th September 2008
On 3rd September 2008 09:04, John Ravenscroft wrote:

"Any thinking man who observes this universe with its unity in diversity, with its multiplicity of being, their constitutional laws written in their very nature, and none having an internal explanation for its own existence, must rationally conclude that some supremely intelligent and supremely powerful being brought this universe into existence."

Kevin O’Sullivan, OFM

I don't see that as rational, Ruth.

All it does is replace one mystery with another - the universe is too complicated not to have been created. So God must have created it. But if the universe is too complicated, how complicated must God be? Who or what created God? I know your answer to that will be 'God exists outside of space and time - he is the uncaused causer...'

But that get-out clause makes O'Sullivan's argument irrational. If we can have an uncreated God, why can't we have an uncreated universe?

I certainly don't call you crazy, Ruth, and I am open to the possibility that there is a creator - but as I said above, I think the possibility is vanishingly small.



Hi John:  Hope the arm is healing nicely.

I disagree with you that the quote is irrational, but rather than going into a big long discussion about it, let's just agree to disagree on this one, OK?

Here's a quote that seems to sum up my take on what you and Sue have been discussing.  It's from Blaise Pascal.

"Reason's last step is the recognition that there are an infinite number of things that go beyond it."

I put up this quote because you said, "One of the many problems with simply saying God did it! is that such a view kills thought and prevents further inquiry. If you're convinced you know all the answers (because God is The Answer), you stop looking, stop wondering and stop growing."  I don't believe that developing spiritually by allowing the possiblilty of God and exploring that a little is to stop growing.  It's another dimension of the human being, but if you don't believe that there is anything spiritual going on in "life," then it will never make sense to you.  Another of Pascal's is "the heart has its reasons, which reason knows not."  This is of course, a dangerous quote, when you think of what horrors we humans are capable of.  But that's where Christ's message of love has to be the overarching principle of what we "think" with our logical minds and what we "feel" in our hearts.  You've already stated that you don't believe that people have spirits or souls, so I think we probably need to take this in another direction.  As I said before, I have no problem with the science, the research and the wonder of atoms and molecules coming together to become "life", but I think that God is the initiator of it all.

"I certainly don't call you crazy, Ruth, and I am open to the possibility that there is a creator - but as I said above, I think the possibility is vanishingly small."

I'm not sure what you mean by vanishingly small, but maybe that's where you need to start, with even that small possiblility, John.  In the vastness of the universe, a vanishingly small possibility might be very large indeed.

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posted at 03:52 on 6th September 2008

OK, John, here's an observation about remote possibilities.  I looked at your You Tube page the other day and saw the latest video you put up of the duet with you and your brother - "Saturday Night."  It's really lovely, by the way.

Do you remember a few pages back when I jokingly remarked to Diana that I had heard of the Holy Spirit referred to as the duct tape of the universe?  I know this may sound very simple minded on my part, but what do you suppose the odds are that I would mention "duct tape" in this thread and then, on the You Tube page of the Saturday Night video - the right hand panel that shows related videos - there would be a video called "Dave Sherman Sings The Duct Tape Blues in Athens, Texas?"  LOL.  I think the Holy Spirit must be lurking around here somewhere, John!  And so I guess as long as "Athens" is mentioned, maybe you should read Acts of the Apostles 17:16-34, where St. Paul tried to explain "the unknown god" to the Athenians, who were always testing theories and philosophizing about the newest ideas.  Maybe that might shed a bit more light on whatever you're trying to understand than my puny brain can.

 

 

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posted at 03:57 on 6th September 2008
On 6th September 2008 00:02, John Ravenscroft wrote:
John, please explain what you mean when you say 'scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief'. 
OK, Sue. Here are just a few of the religious dogmas Science has undermined. The church - kicking and screaming every step of the way - has eventually had to accept that every one of them is wrong.
  
  • The Earth is at the center of the Universe.
  • The Earth is the only object of its kind in the Universe,
  • The Sun is at the center of the Universe.
  • The Milky Way is the only galaxy in the Universe.
  • The Milky Way is at the center of the Universe.
  • Our Sun is the only star with planets.
  • Our Sun and planets have been in the universe since very near its beginning.
  • The velocity of the Earth in space constitutes an absolute frame of reference for the rest of the Universe.
  • Humans are different from other animals in that we were specially created by the Creator in His own image.
  • Humans have special immunity from the laws of nature.
  • Humans are different in kind from other animals:


John, this is a very good illustration of the church's "evolution" if you will, of its understanding of God and creation.  Don't get stuck in the 16th century if you want to know what Christianity is about today, John.

And yes, Sue, I agree that 9 and 11 are, as you say over there in Old Blighty, spot on!

 

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions