Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 12:23 on 5th September 2008 On 4th September 2008 23:59, Sue Gaffney-Ryder wrote:
Sue, imagine you were born in a different part of the universe - on a planet that orbits a red sun. Like millions of your ancestors, when you were a child you looked up and wondered why the sun was red. Your culture has an ancient book called 'The Secrets of the Universe'. Children are taught that the words in this book are not to be doubted: they were dictated by the Great Unicorn and they are true now, they always were true, and they always will be true. The book tells you that the sun is red because the Great Unicorn threw a red grape into the sky. It stayed there and since that day it has bathed the world in a wonderful red light. Now you have children of your own, and when they ask you why the sun is red you tell them about the grape. You don't need to learn anything about the life-cycle of stars - and neither do your children. You know why the sun is red. Why bother to look for other answers when you already have the one, true answer? The reason there is so much conflict between science and religion can be found in the fact that scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief. Look at your reaction to Richard Dawkins - just the sight of his name is enough to make you refuse to read an article containing some of his thoughts. I'd be interested to know why you react that way. |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 12:25 on 5th September 2008 On 5th September 2008 01:46, Wolf wrote:
Poor old John Peel. |
Shirley K. Lawson Posts: 2310 Joined: 17th Jul 2008 Location: USA | Posted at 16:50 on 5th September 2008 I'm back for an bit....the article I mentioned prior can be found in the Kindred Spirit Magazine, Winter issue (DEC-FEb) 1995-6, ..the article is called Electro-crystal therapy...and it comes by way of an Harry Oldfied, whom runs The School of Elecrocrystal Therapy at 177 Long Drive, South Ruislip, Miidlesex HA4OHL .....I have no idea if the school exists yet or not, but go to the library near you and read this article Page 22.24. has color aura pictures with the article. |
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | editPosted at 22:21 on 5th September 2008 John, please explain what you mean when you say 'scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief'. A few pages back I quoted a few words 'He is hanging the earth upon nothing' Isaiah 40 v 22 says: He dwells enthroned above the circle/sphere/globe (different translations) of the earth. Until about 3 or 4 hundred years ago, as you know, we thought the earth was flat and we might fall off the edge. Now, how did these writers, three thousand years ago know the truth. Richard Dawkins does not hide his contempt for believers of God. That is why I gave him a miss. He should try a bit of humility. |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 00:02 on 6th September 2008 John, please explain what you mean when you say 'scientific investigation constantly undermines religious belief'. OK, Sue. Here are just a few of the religious dogmas Science has undermined. The church - kicking and screaming every step of the way - has eventually had to accept that every one of them is wrong.
|
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | editPosted at 00:19 on 6th September 2008 Oh John, I am not referring to things that have been naturally proved down the ages. I should have made myself clearer: How does scientific investigation undermine the bible. Now, please would you answer the questions I have asked in my last post. How did those writers three thousand years ago know the truth. |
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | editPosted at 00:25 on 6th September 2008 Numbers 9 and 11 are most certainly correct. |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | Posted at 03:14 on 6th September 2008 On 3rd September 2008 09:04, John Ravenscroft wrote:
I disagree with you that the quote is irrational, but rather than going into a big long discussion about it, let's just agree to disagree on this one, OK? Here's a quote that seems to sum up my take on what you and Sue have been discussing. It's from Blaise Pascal. "Reason's last step is the recognition that there are an infinite number of things that go beyond it." I put up this quote because you said, "One of the many problems with simply saying God did it! is that such a view kills thought and prevents further inquiry. If you're convinced you know all the answers (because God is The Answer), you stop looking, stop wondering and stop growing." I don't believe that developing spiritually by allowing the possiblilty of God and exploring that a little is to stop growing. It's another dimension of the human being, but if you don't believe that there is anything spiritual going on in "life," then it will never make sense to you. Another of Pascal's is "the heart has its reasons, which reason knows not." This is of course, a dangerous quote, when you think of what horrors we humans are capable of. But that's where Christ's message of love has to be the overarching principle of what we "think" with our logical minds and what we "feel" in our hearts. You've already stated that you don't believe that people have spirits or souls, so I think we probably need to take this in another direction. As I said before, I have no problem with the science, the research and the wonder of atoms and molecules coming together to become "life", but I think that God is the initiator of it all. "I certainly don't call you crazy, Ruth, and I am open to the possibility that there is a creator - but as I said above, I think the possibility is vanishingly small." I'm not sure what you mean by vanishingly small, but maybe that's where you need to start, with even that small possiblility, John. In the vastness of the universe, a vanishingly small possibility might be very large indeed.
|
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | Posted at 03:52 on 6th September 2008 OK, John, here's an observation about remote possibilities. I looked at your You Tube page the other day and saw the latest video you put up of the duet with you and your brother - "Saturday Night." It's really lovely, by the way. Do you remember a few pages back when I jokingly remarked to Diana that I had heard of the Holy Spirit referred to as the duct tape of the universe? I know this may sound very simple minded on my part, but what do you suppose the odds are that I would mention "duct tape" in this thread and then, on the You Tube page of the Saturday Night video - the right hand panel that shows related videos - there would be a video called "Dave Sherman Sings The Duct Tape Blues in Athens, Texas?" LOL. I think the Holy Spirit must be lurking around here somewhere, John! And so I guess as long as "Athens" is mentioned, maybe you should read Acts of the Apostles 17:16-34, where St. Paul tried to explain "the unknown god" to the Athenians, who were always testing theories and philosophizing about the newest ideas. Maybe that might shed a bit more light on whatever you're trying to understand than my puny brain can.
|
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | Posted at 03:57 on 6th September 2008 On 6th September 2008 00:02, John Ravenscroft wrote:
And yes, Sue, I agree that 9 and 11 are, as you say over there in Old Blighty, spot on!
|