Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Ron Brind Posts: 19041 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 16:02 on 28th November 2009 Men were also able to relieve themselves on the rear offside wheel of the coach (furthest away from the path) without prosecution, which still remains law in this country. |
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 16:14 on 28th November 2009 Apricot pits can be fatal if ingested. The pit contains cyanogenetic glycosides, which are converted into cyanide upon digestion! The uncooked sprouts that sometimes appear on potatoes are toxic, and though the toxicity level is low for adults, young children have died from ingesting them. Edited by: Diana Sinclair at:28th November 2009 16:17 |
David Donnelly Posts: 61 Joined: 22nd Jan 2009 Location: UK | quotePosted at 16:42 on 28th November 2009 "The custom of driving on the left or right side of the road varies from country to country, and its origins predate the invention of the automobile. During the 1700s, in England, horse-drawn coaches were the main mode of transportation for urban dwellers. British coachmen used to sit on a seat on the right side of the carriage. If the coach traveled down the right side of the road, the coachman's whip would have struck pedestrians strolling along the adjacent sidewalk. By keeping to the left, the coachman had room to use his whip and the pedestrians were safe. The coach drivers could just as easily have sat on the left side and driven on the right, but that is not the way it turned out."
Another version is that most men being right handed therefore having a right handed sword arm, drove on the left so the could easily repel Highwaymen, vagabonds and ner-do-wells. Also apparently true in Japan, popularised by the Samurai. |
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 17:06 on 28th November 2009 Odds are that if you had a touch of what you thought was the flu or "a bug", and you had a headache, accompanied by diarrhea or vomiting, it was not the flu, but food poisoning. The flu is a virus and its typical symptoms are more respiratory in nature. Each year, roughly one third of the U.S. population will get noticeable food poisoning and mistakenly call it the "stomach flu". The most common cause of the "stomach flu" is salmonella poisoning, the symptoms of which can appear from several hours to even a few days after the tainted food is consumed, and is most often "self inflicted". Most likely causes: undercooked meat, cross contamination when uncooked meats and raw veggies share the same cutting board, etc. |
Paul Hilton Posts: 2605 Joined: 21st Nov 2004 Location: UK | quotePosted at 23:09 on 29th November 2009 On 28th November 2009 16:42, David Donnelly wrote: And in Canada, it was up to each Province which side of the road they drove on, thus some decided to follow the US, while others decided to follow Britain, which made for a bit of a mess before they all finally decided to follow the US, which had been largely influenced by Henry Ford and his millions of LHD Model T's, and his belief that driving on the right was correct for a LHD car, while posh car makers had decided to copy Rolls-Royce and keep their cars RHD, despite driving on the right.
Edited by: Paul Hilton at:29th November 2009 23:11 |
Paul Hilton Posts: 2605 Joined: 21st Nov 2004 Location: UK | quotePosted at 00:00 on 30th November 2009 On 28th November 2009 16:02, Ron Brind wrote:
I think that goes back to the so-called Carters Law--horses and carts, though with the proviso, the right hand is in contact with the vehicle at the same time. But, if a pregant lady found herself in such a predicament, she can avail herself the use of a policemans' helmet. |
Paul Hilton Posts: 2605 Joined: 21st Nov 2004 Location: UK | quotePosted at 00:02 on 30th November 2009 In 1659, Massachusetts made celebrating Christmas illegal as pronounced by the Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony----- "For preventing disorders, arising in several places within this jurisdiction by reason of some still observing such festivals as were superstitiously kept in other communities, to the great dishonor of God and offense of others: it is therefore ordered by this court and the authority thereof that whosoever shall be found observing any such day as Christmas or the like, either by forbearing of labor, feasting, or any other way, upon any such account as aforesaid, every such person so offending shall pay for every such offence five shilling as a fine to the county." |
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 16:27 on 30th November 2009 Good ole Massachusetts Bay Colony....of course that lot was your lot fresh from the shores of England. Lol. ;-) |
Ron Brind Posts: 19041 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 17:52 on 30th November 2009 Its against the law for us not to attend Church on Christmas day! |
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 17:53 on 30th November 2009 You mean, it's against secular law or church law, Ron? |