Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Philip Cross Posts: 17 Joined: 23rd Jun 2013 Location: England | quotePosted at 00:14 on 27th June 2013 Anyone got any experience with them? Good and bad. Ive heard they are not the easiest lens to use. Thinking of buying one and did not want to waste my money if they are awful? |
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 07:16 on 27th June 2013 Hi Phil, I have to Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 and have to say the times I have used it, it has proven to be a superb piece of glass. It is quite heavy but that just gives me more confidence with it. Doesn't get used as often as it should!!! Is only made for use on crop factor cameras so in effect the 10mm becomes equivalent of 16 on a Canon, ie 1.6 crop factor. Can't say that I have had difficulty using it, but what you MUST ensure with a lens as wide as this is good foreground interest, otherwise you will find a lot of wasted space in your images and they will look very average. Mine was second hand from a friend so I knew its history,but there are very good deals to be had on used equipment if you go to the right places. But it is certainly a great lens to add to your bag, although it does have limited use....... If you can get one at the right price, although new seem to have dropped a bit recently, I would certainly go for it. But as indicated above, it is NOT a lens you will use everyday..... |
Philip Cross Posts: 17 Joined: 23rd Jun 2013 Location: England | quotePosted at 09:45 on 27th June 2013 Hi thanks Dave much appreciated. Yes think im going to go for it after your advice. Have seen a few good used ones for sale. Shall keeo in mind what you said about the foreground too. Hopefully I'll have some results on here in time. |
Rod Burkey Posts: 554 Joined: 2nd Sep 2008 Location: UK | quotePosted at 00:47 on 28th June 2013 Like Dave, I also am the proud owner of a Sigma 10-20mm lens. In truth, I think it is easier to use than a long telephoto or zoom lens as it can be used with far longer shutter speeds without camera shake. Also, wide angle lenses also offer great depth of field. I love mine as the results are just great and most suited to rural and urban landscapes. The f3.5 version is a real asset in my arsenal and Philip if you can find a used one, either the F3.5 or 4.5 I doubt you will be sorry. Cheers! Rod.
Edited by: Rod Burkey at:28th June 2013 00:49 |
Edward Lever Posts: 734 Joined: 22nd Dec 2005 Location: UK | quotePosted at 01:14 on 28th June 2013 As Dave says, most 10 mm lenses of this type were developed specifically for the 1.6X crop factor cameras. If you really need an ultra wide view, you have no option but to get one of these lenses. They are not cheap (typically £300 - £500 new). Personally, I couldn't justify the cost of such a lens for my 1.6X crop factor camera, because of the limited use I would get out of it, but this depends on what type of photography you do. However, if you ever consider buying a full frame camera, it is much easier to get that ultra wide view with inexpensive used lenses. For example, I picked up a Tamron 19 - 35 mm full frame lens for under £100, which when fitted to a full frame camera, is equivalent to a 12 - 22 mm lens fitted to a 1.6X crop factor camera. This approach actually worked out cheaper for me because I had recently bought a used full frame camera. Edited by: Edward Lever at:28th June 2013 01:36 |
Philip Cross Posts: 17 Joined: 23rd Jun 2013 Location: England | quotePosted at 09:40 on 28th June 2013 Thanks everyone. Its much appreciated. Shall definately be getting one now. |
Please login to post to this thread... |