Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Jason T Posts: 7421 Joined: 14th Apr 2004 Location: UK | quotePosted at 14:04 on 30th July 2009 Yep there is, loads, but the powers that be think these people can be rehab'd, and live in the community!! They are a danger, we go out to people all the time that we think are time bombs! |
lancashirelove Posts: 1986 Joined: 18th Feb 2009 Location: UK | quotePosted at 14:19 on 30th July 2009 mmmmmmmmmmm/ do-gooders again, closed down all the big institutions that used to care (and yes, sometimes abuse) for these individuals. Care in the Community they call it. (Dont-care in the community is what happened) we now have a two-tier social service, the over-paid busybodies and the overstretched, overworked volenteers! |
Krissy Posts: 15430 Joined: 8th Jul 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 14:24 on 30th July 2009 On 30th July 2009 10:17, Jason T wrote:
Most likely she did and yet she was still "allowed" to have a child. Was this her only child? |
Jason T Posts: 7421 Joined: 14th Apr 2004 Location: UK | quotePosted at 14:58 on 30th July 2009 On 30th July 2009 14:19, michael gerrard wrote:
Yep your right, care in the community causes a lot of problems! yes, some can live in the community very well, but they are letting to many, and the wrong sort! we go to a lot of mental health jobs, and really there is no back up, the institutions, although some were bad, on the whole were a good idea, it kept the dangerous ones off the street, after all its not only the mentally ill that have rights, we also must have some kind of right not to be torn to pieces by a mentally ill person, that everyone knew was a danger, yet was allowed to live in the community!! |
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 16:10 on 30th July 2009 On 30th July 2009 10:37, Babs ' wrote:
I read about that too, Babs. Horrible! |
Please login to post to this thread... |