Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Rob Faleer Posts: 703 Joined: 10th Jun 2005 Location: USA | quotePosted at 19:29 on 15th December 2010 On 15th December 2010 18:47, Krissy wrote:
With or without his nose, Krissy? I would love to share a meal with Wellington, Blücher and Napoleon to discuss the battle of Waterloo and ask them what they would have done differently regarding their tactics. |
Sk Lawson Posts: 4014 Joined: 7th Oct 2010 Location: USA | quotePosted at 19:33 on 15th December 2010 Oh gosh...such an loaded question...I have an lot of good freinds that have passed over now...but so have an lot of celebraties also....I'd have to rent some kind of banquet hall perhaps, or an big lodge of some kind to fit in everyone. Then I could ask questions and visit and be most happy and them also. Yes, Cathy...on the 1800's and getting filled in on the family lineages...as I disagree with what's been written to-date by another person that just kind of "stepped" in with this. I see people are doing that now..."making" thier own family these days in legacy. I know whom the Pennsylvania Historical people think they are...Rev. Thomas Larkin m .Elizabeth Hill...in some records he's said Thomas Martin...one of three "bishops" founded Methodism in Pennsylvania. They put that in thier local history after this other person went through and decided for everyone else what she declared our legacy to be. That is not whom I was given by another historical society in Tennesee...they sent me the will of whom they think it is right off the bat...an William Larkin traveling with John and Thomas Lawson buying up ground for George Washington...and indeed he must of been an "Mason" from all the associates I have around them involved. But I also wonder if he was not an William Lucus m. Elizabeth Pierce in Virginia also. The name of "Robert" in the family in Tenneesee is an "Scottish" name for Robert Bruce...whom Geo. Washington's family put into political power...and its Robt. Larkin says he knows the family were into the Masonic lodge in the late 1700's. This fella's story was written long ago and while they don't know all the family...you know that it is compatible with the Masonic Lodge affilation through the years..... It's not "new" found information. Hehad no special interest at the time for what he said about the family as is often today. I think the Methodist Thomas Larkin is an son or brother of this William Larkin. Purcell family holds William E. Larkins in thier files as "family" through his Reed (Reade)-Strawn wife and they ARE intermarried with George Washington's family.
|
Krissy Posts: 15430 Joined: 8th Jul 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 19:42 on 15th December 2010 Either way is fine with me Rob!! LOL! I watched The Dutchess last night. Whew...what a movie! SO, I would mind inviting Gerogianna Cavendish Dutchess of Devonshire. I have a million questions for her!!
|
Please login to post to this thread... |