Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Ron Brind Posts: 19041 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 06:46 on 3rd May 2013 Yes, my opinion is that the Afghan interpreters that have helped British Forces MUST be allowed to settle in Britain. We allow crooks and thieves to stay, but want to refuse these people who have helped us in a difficult situation. What's wrong with our whimp of a government, they really do encourage people to tighten the rope around their necks. What say you members? |
Andrew Marks Posts: 59 Joined: 1st May 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 07:00 on 3rd May 2013 Well, when the British people are criminalised for tax errors, are not allowed to claim for benefits but criminals and terrorists can, is it any wonder the powers that be dump on the people from other countries that help us? You only have to look at how they treat the Gurkhas to see their blinkered and somewhat retarded mentality |
Ron Brind Posts: 19041 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 08:08 on 3rd May 2013 You have said it all in a short paragraph there Andrew so when the Government wakes up from their bad dream last night, maybe they will get their a...e into gear and start doing something about it, but make no mistake UKIP are a force to be reckoned with now. |
James Prescott Posts: 25952 Joined: 11th Jan 2010 Location: UK | quotePosted at 14:22 on 3rd May 2013 Idont mind em staying here they have been doing a very good and dangerous job--but their Aunts, Uncles and uncle tom cobly should not be allowed to settle over here--only direct family. |
Ron Brind Posts: 19041 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 16:10 on 3rd May 2013 Agree James - immediate family accepted, but that's it. |
Please login to post to this thread... |