Pictures of England

Search:

Historic Towns & Picturesque Villages

A picture of RyeBath AbbeyA picture of Bath AbbeyBag End?A picture of Barton Le ClayA picture of Barton Le Clay

Colour verses Black and White.

**Please support PoE by donating today - thank you**
 
Rod BurkeyPremier Member - Click for more info
Rod Burkey
Posts: 554
Joined: 2nd Sep 2008
Location: UK
quotePosted at 12:36 on 5th May 2014

Good luck with the film. As long as it has not been kept in a very warm place it should be more than okay. I've stiil got a couple of rolls of Fuji Velvia which I used to love. SDtill got the Nikon FE and FMs too. Noth worth a carrot but I could not bear to sell them for next to nothing. Too many happy memories as well as the thousands of negs and slides, plus boxes of prints Mrs.B would be more than happy to donate to the refuse collection officers!

Black and White does focus the mind. To aid the process with digital images, Photoshop offers a very simple conversion with the addition of colour filters much like the ones used with monochrome film, ie red, orange, green etc to draw out the tones. OnOne also do a stand alone software called "Perfect B&W" which is very good and offers to also give the look of a range of Black & White films, and grain, plus borders to add attractive frames to the image.

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Edward Lever
Edward Lever
Posts: 734
Joined: 22nd Dec 2005
Location: UK
quotePosted at 13:26 on 5th May 2014

Thanks, Rod, for your suggestions. I recall that B&W film lasts better than Colour Neg. I got some very strange colour shifts in the past with out-of-date Colour Neg film.

Yes, use of colour filter effects on monochrome digital images is another useful trick to get better separation and contrast. I will also have a look at the 'Perfect B&W' software you mention. I hope you hang on to your negs and slides, there may be some rainy days for you to do some scanning, so keep them hidden from Mrs.B ! 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Edward Lever
Edward Lever
Posts: 734
Joined: 22nd Dec 2005
Location: UK
quotePosted at 22:33 on 5th May 2014

A scanned image from 35mm film can be as good or better than a digital image from a digital camera, although there is a likelihood of more specks and scratch marks on a scanned image, which may require editing out afterwards. 

Some of my images on PoE are scans from film, for example this one (scanned from a 35mm Fujichrome transparency). I gave up on scanning because it was too time-consuming.

 Monument outside St. Mary's Church, Henley-on-Thames

Picture by Edward Lever


Edited by: Edward Lever at:5th May 2014 22:46
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Vince Hawthorn
Vince Hawthorn
Posts: 12758
Joined: 19th Apr 2010
Location: UK
quotePosted at 23:07 on 5th May 2014

 I have been recently scanning a few slides and certainly it is something to see the shots again but I do find they come out quite often with a bit of a cast in the colour. Certainly the worst ones are the oldest and have been in the loft for years. The boxes stored in the cupoard under the stairs do seem to be a bit better. I know I am only using a basic scanner but for what I originally needed to copy ( the burnt out planes at Predannack ) it was half the cost of what a local photo shop wanted to copy a set of only half a dozen.

             I have today had a peep at a couple of some of the better ones and definately better so I shall carry on. 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Dave John
Dave John
Posts: 22335
Joined: 27th Feb 2011
Location: England
quotePosted at 23:31 on 5th May 2014
Yes, I too have literaqlly 1000's of slides which I really need to look through and scan the best, but as with with most things it is finding the time to do it. Just looking through them will be a big enough task let alone deciding what to scan and what not to. Like Vince I have a basic scanner which is about 7 years old so the get the best results really need to invest in a new one, but £140-150 can do a lot of other things !!!
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Edward Lever
Edward Lever
Posts: 734
Joined: 22nd Dec 2005
Location: UK
quotePosted at 23:36 on 5th May 2014

A loft is probably the worst place to store slides or negatives. The extremes of temperature and humidity are very damaging, let alone the dusty conditions.  Storage at a constant moderate room temperature avoiding high humidity is the best bet. 

Even so, how likely is it that your digital data will be accessible in 40 years or more?  But that is the topic of another thread I think. 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Dave John
Dave John
Posts: 22335
Joined: 27th Feb 2011
Location: England
quotePosted at 23:44 on 5th May 2014
Our loft was very well ventillaed but my slides were one of the few thinks that I refused to ever put up there. VHS tapes went up there well boxed etc and all now totally beyong recovery, even professionally, but as you say Edward, the subject for another thread maybe, that of storage and longevity of the modern media?
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Edward Lever
Edward Lever
Posts: 734
Joined: 22nd Dec 2005
Location: UK
quotePosted at 08:41 on 6th May 2014
On 5th May 2014 23:44, Dave John wrote:
>>>>> but as you say Edward, the subject for another thread maybe, that of storage and longevity of the modern media?

Yes indeed, Dave. We have a long way to go with image storage to achieve the sort of longevity achieved by cave paintings or Sumerian clay tablets. Progress is sometimes an illusion.
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
 Please login to post to this thread...