Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Roy Jackson Posts: 231 Joined: 17th Feb 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 22:12 on 17th January 2009 Hi Ron. Sorry for not replying earlier. There is nothing wrong with a bit of woodpidgeon pie. I have eaten it many times, especially when local farmers have been reducing their numbers. Woodpedgeons can be regarded as vermin when their numbers become to large. I expect this comment will put 'the cat among the pidgeons' in certain quarters. Regards Roy J. |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 22:22 on 17th January 2009 On 17th January 2009 20:50, Diana Sinclair wrote:
LOL, Diana. It doesn't look like she can miss with the worm though. Isn't nature amazing, that those little bitty bird babies have such huge mouths? Hi Roy! Nice to see you.
|
Sue H Posts: 8172 Joined: 29th Jun 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 00:10 on 18th January 2009 |
Stephanie Jackson Posts: 3911 Joined: 13th Apr 2008 Location: UK | quotePosted at 12:48 on 18th January 2009 Thanks Sue! I took that one yesterday. I had a day off (working again today - just having a 5 minute break!). We walked through the nature reserve, up to the reservoir and then along the canal to a great place called Bumble Hole. It was an amazing day - bright sunshine and not too cold (about 8). This moorhen was hiding in the trees. We were walking for 3 hours and little Sol only had to go on Dad's shoulders for the last leg of the journey! The reservoir and canal have some amazing birds to spot. |
Ron Brind Posts: 19041 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 18:38 on 18th January 2009 Hi Roy, woodpigeon washed down with a glass of something or other as in your avatar! And yes, despite there beauty, vermin - tree rats no less!! |
Gemm Ferrane Posts: 36 Joined: 12th Dec 2006 Location: UK | quotePosted at 21:27 on 18th January 2009 On 17th January 2009 04:24, Ruth Gregory wrote: Sorry to spoil the fun but you may find that photographing the chicks in the nest is strongly discouraged (unless you are at a well qualified position to do so) as the parents often abandon them if they are disturbed. For this reason many bird photography sites don't even allow nest images to be posted. Sorry if this has been mentioned before but I thought I'd just comment about it. No offence or criticism to the photographer intended at all.
Edited by: Gemm Ferrane at:18th January 2009 22:25 |
Sue H Posts: 8172 Joined: 29th Jun 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 22:27 on 18th January 2009 Thanks for the information Gemm. |
Ray Stear Posts: 1930 Joined: 25th Apr 2008 Location: UK | quotePosted at 23:26 on 18th January 2009 That is 'food for thought' Gemm |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 02:12 on 19th January 2009 Yes, very true, Gemm, good point. However, I think current thinking, (at least over here) is that wildlife parents abandoning their young if they've been disturbed is largely a myth, unless its a constant disturbance. The instinct to raise young is just too strong in most species. Over here, people are discouraged from trying to "help" or "rescue" what appears to be an abandoned baby. In most cases, mother is not far away. But yes, you're definitely right about photographing or revealing the location of nesting sites.
|
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 21:09 on 21st January 2009 Very nice! Picture by BRIAN ARLOW |