Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Rod Burkey Posts: 554 Joined: 2nd Sep 2008 Location: UK | quotePosted at 18:21 on 30th March 2015 Ruth, I don't think you need Skylight filters as you already have UV filters. The difference is so marginal, that in my view makes tham a duplication rather than an asset. Every lens needs one or the other. That's my view but other POE members may well have a view that differs. Graduated filters are fine for adding tone in skies, whilst leaving the rest of the image as you want it. Grey grads are good for winter skies. Pink or tobacco are good for warming up the sky too. A good buy is Photoshop Elements........ Enjoy yourself and the new equipment.
|
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 18:52 on 30th March 2015 Hi Ruth, which tele zoom did you get with the bundle. I suspect it may have been a Sigma 70-300 in which case I think that may have a macro setting. Although I was never overly happy with the results on mine!! However my suggestion would be to buy a set of 'close up lenses' usually in sets of 3 or 4 that simply fit onto the front of the lens just like a normal filter. If you get a set for your basic kit lens, the 52mm thread, you should get very good results. Rod is right about the skylight filters in that you already have UV, so no point and as to graduated filters, these are great for toning down bright skies in landscapes but you are then looking into the realms of using a tripod on most occasions in order to get the graduation correct. I am also with Rod in that Elements would also be a good buy if you intend to do much editing although I know you already have several other options on that score
|
rustyruth Posts: 18773 Joined: 23rd Oct 2012 Location: England | quotePosted at 19:50 on 30th March 2015 Thanks Rod, Dave, great advice as usual, much appreciated. Dave you are spot on with the Sigma lens, that is the one I have, I haven't had chance to try it yet, but hopefully next week. All I've done so far is put the UV filter on it. Thanks for the heads up on the close up lenses I'll have a look into those. Regarding Photshop Elements, I being thinking about it for ages, I was putting off buying it until I got a new laptop, but that isn't going to be happening anytime soon. It's recently been to Apple for its annual wash and brush up and a diagnostics test (whatever that is, I just smiled politely) I'm told there's a few years in the old boy yet, it's getting a bit like Triggers broom, every time I leave it for an hour it comes back with new bits on it. Can't complain, it's free. Seems like it might be worth me looking at buying Elements after all, I do quite a bit of editing, and once bought it's mine for good. Anyway, thanks again, I'm sure I'll enjoy the new equipment Rod. |
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 20:15 on 30th March 2015 There is probably more chance of better help with Elements as opposed to the other suites you have access to. But now you have the Nikon View suite installed maybe Rod has a used that and may be able to offer assistance. |
rustyruth Posts: 18773 Joined: 23rd Oct 2012 Location: England | quotePosted at 20:35 on 30th March 2015 I think you're probably right about Elements Dave. I shall have a look at it, shame I don't know anyone local who uses it so I could have a tinker. My sister in law has full photoshop for her job, but I suspect there may be a slight difference, I know there is in price. I shall contact Rod about the Nikon View suite, I'm hoping he won't mind |
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 20:53 on 30th March 2015 The full version is now only available on monthly subscription. I have CS4 but that came from a friend who upgraded to CS6 Elements has all you will probably need and then you will only probably use less than 10% of it. It comes bundled with Adobe Camera Raw which you will need as and when you get usd to the camera and try shooting in RAW format. But more about that as and when you get there. You got a new camera to get used to first and I cannot think of anywhere better than Ambleside and surrounding area to give it a good test. Make sure you have plenty of memory cards and take loads. Just hope you have reasonable weather |
Vince Hawthorn Posts: 12758 Joined: 19th Apr 2010 Location: UK | quotePosted at 21:45 on 30th March 2015 Hey ! I started this thread and now others are already getting theirs and I am still looking, about time I got on with the job and put my order in as well. I looked in on SRB as Dave suggested but am now stuck on which one to choose, there is one for £18 and another for £25 - the second being made of nano coated German glass while the cheaper is a composite material as Dave called it. Question which is the most wise choice? It does make you ask if this company produces said filters at the prices above, how is it some other well known names charge up to around £200 for their products- especially if the effect is the same? |
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 22:09 on 30th March 2015 I have not experienced any problem with my 'plastic' filter but for the sake of a few pounds I would definitley go for the glass alternative. Pity I did not notice it at the time I ordered mine, unless they are new stock..... Pricewise if you are comparing with HOYA, KOOD and the likes, those guys are the best and probably use 'optical' quality glass and all other machining etc will just have that extra edge.
Edited by: Dave John at:30th March 2015 22:10 |
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 22:12 on 30th March 2015 Just make sure you order CIRCULAR not Linear |
Vince Hawthorn Posts: 12758 Joined: 19th Apr 2010 Location: UK | quotePosted at 22:19 on 30th March 2015 I am on the ball with that one Dave- but thanks for making the point for any others starting out in this direction. Think you have made up my mind, glass for the Polariser but I think the composite will be fine for a UV. |