Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
Patrick Hogan Posts: 68 Joined: 12th Jun 2010 Location: UK | quotePosted at 22:33 on 11th May 2015 On 11th May 2015 22:22, Daniel Preston wrote:
So there still is a filter ! |
Daniel Preston Posts: 5 Joined: 11th May 2015 Location: UK | quotePosted at 22:37 on 11th May 2015 Different filters indeed, but still in the light path, so both cause problems, no matter what spin you put on it. |
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 22:41 on 11th May 2015 Yes indeed but they are built into the camera and are not user adaptable whereas the filters Patrick is talking about are additional and many shapes and forms for various types of effects not just protecting the lens . . . and also as mentioned earlier by Patrick used extensively by professionals and specialist landscape photographers, some are particulary good at making skies stand out behind cottages |
Edward Lever Posts: 734 Joined: 22nd Dec 2005 Location: UK | quotePosted at 06:01 on 12th May 2015 Aliasing is a general term in Digital Sampling Theory (it applies to digital sampling of any function) and refers to 'Aliases', or false components in the reconstructed function as a result of the sampling process. A description of the aliasing effect can be found Here Aliasing occurs whenever the sampling rate (either time or spatial sampling) is insufficiently high to cope with the level of detail in whatever is being sampled. The mathematics are a little complicated, but if you want details then Googling Nyquist and Shannon will tell you more. The digital camera is just one example where an anti-aliasing filter is used. In digital audio, the anti-aliasing filter is an electrical low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency at around half the sampling frequency. For example, audio CDs use a sample rate of 44.1 kHz, and the anti-aliasing filter used in the recording process blocks audio frequencies above approximately 20 kHz (the upper limit of human hearing). In a digital camera, where the sampling is in the spatial domain, the strength of the anti-aliasing filter depends on the the resolution of the sensor. Aliasing occurs if the detail in the image presented to the sensor is greater than half the resolution of the sensor. The anti-aliasing filter in a DSLR can therefore be regarded as a 'blurring' filter, but its purpose is to prevent false detail appearing in the captured image. Some DSLRs are made without anti-aliasing filters for those people who want higher apparent sharpness, but the perception of sharpness in the resulting image does not represent reality, since the sharp details are mostly false (aliases). There is only one camera I know of where the anti-aliasing is done without a physical filter in front of the sensor. This is the Pentax K-3 where the sensor is vibrated minutely to blur the image. Not only can the anti-aliasing be switched off completely if required, but the degree of anti-aliasing is controllable. I realise I have rambled off the topic of 'Cleaning a DSLR', but the anti-aliasing filter should be regarded as an essential part of the camera, and is not merely an 'effects' filter. Edited by: Edward Lever at:12th May 2015 11:34 |
rustyruth Posts: 18773 Joined: 23rd Oct 2012 Location: England | quotePosted at 16:53 on 12th May 2015 Whilst my original question has been answered, thank you all, and some interesting and informative posts have been made regarding other issues, UV filters, silica gel sachets etc. I am still puzzled as to why POE has not responded to some of the other queries, I appreciate they were off topic and I did consider starting a new thread to address these issues, but being as most of the conversations have gone on here it seemed a little silly to start again and either duplicate or lose what has already been said. My initial post yesterday was answered very quickly when I suggested that there was a security flaw at POE, or in fact a virus. I was assured that neither was the case - well I'm not convinced. We still have not had an answer as to why comments are missing from some of our photos, I know we have only managed to ascertain so far that the comments are missing from one member - John, but there may well be others who have not come to light yet. I intend when I have a little more time to investigate this further by going through some of my other pictures, the ones where I know comments have been made by other people. We have not had an answer as to why we cannot access the photos posted here by John. I apologise for keep mentioning John, but he is the only member I've been able to identify so far where pictures (and comments) have vanished. I'm beginning to wonder if there are other members out there who have pictures that have disappeared, and either they, or we haven't noticed yet. I'm still confused about the state some of the forums are in, no improvements have been made since it was first noticed that something was wrong, although I seem to recall that it was said work was going on to sort the problem out. This doesn't appear to be happening, several of the popular forums are still missing pages, posts, pictures etc and are therefore unusable. I do appreciate the running of a web site is time consuming and at times difficult, but surely one of the many world wide moderators could shed some light on the problem. Something is most certainly wrong and a credible answer to the problem has yet to be forthcoming. I look forward to hearing something. |
rustyruth Posts: 18773 Joined: 23rd Oct 2012 Location: England | quotePosted at 16:55 on 12th May 2015 Back on topic, I've ordered a LENSPEN Dave, thanks. I'll also take care to watch the silica gel sachets don't burst open |
poe Posts: 1132 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 17:42 on 12th May 2015 Hi Ruth, We'd appreciate if you didnt keep implying that the forum threads problem is the result of a hack or virus, as we have already told you it isn't. It is a technical issue (in house) that we are already working on. If you are still not convinced, that is your prerogative, but we'd appreciate it if you didn't bring it up again in the forum as it will do no good for the site and really is unnecessary. Regarding any members photos/comments that have disappeared, this would only be as a direct result of either them or us removing them, and nothing else. There is a privacy issue there so we won't be more specific on that, and we'd appreciate it not being discussed on the PoE forum out of respect for any members involved. Thank you for your support in this matter, Chris & Sarah
|
Dave John Posts: 22335 Joined: 27th Feb 2011 Location: England | quotePosted at 20:03 on 12th May 2015 On 12th May 2015 16:55, rustyruth wrote:
You won't regret it Ruth a very well worth investment |
rustyruth Posts: 18773 Joined: 23rd Oct 2012 Location: England | quotePosted at 20:09 on 12th May 2015 A rather ambiguous reply, but now I understand why, everything falls into place. I've managed to sort the problem out myself. Having spent a few hours searching around the Internet and making a few phone calls I've managed to locate and get in contact with John. I now know exactly what's happened, why his photos have gone, and indeed his account. I now realise why there are holes in some of the forums. Anyway it's a long story. Anyone who wants to PM me, I have John's email address, I know some of you want to keep in touch, he is a good friend. I also know where he is posting his pictures now and he's quite happy to share the details with his friends. |
rustyruth Posts: 18773 Joined: 23rd Oct 2012 Location: England | quotePosted at 20:10 on 12th May 2015 I'm sure I won't Dave, I look forward to its arrival. |