Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
poe Posts: 1132 Joined: 26th Oct 2003 Location: England | quotePosted at 10:36 on 14th September 2008 On 13th September 2008 00:58, Paul Hilton wrote:
Regarding my original question, here is a fun little video on youtube where they ask a group of children the same question -
| |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 11:40 on 14th September 2008 On 13th September 2008 19:29, Catherine England Schleunes wrote:
The student was called Catherine, too. The religious education teacher was called Helen, and believe it or not her surname was Moses! | |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 11:44 on 14th September 2008 Excuse the spelling of compliment. This speech recognition software is fantastic - and the more I use it the better it gets - but it still makes the odd mistake. | |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 12:06 on 14th September 2008 On 14th September 2008 04:58, Ruth Gregory wrote:
Confirmation bias is a form of selective thinking that focuses on evidence that supports what believers already believe while ignoring evidence that refutes their beliefs. Confirmation bias plays a stronger role when people base their beliefs upon faith, tradition and prejudice. For example, if someone believes in the power of prayer, the believer will notice the few "answered" prayers while ignoring the majority of unanswered prayers, or will say things like 'prayer is often a paradox' - God answers in ways we don't expect - his care of us is only noticed in hindsight etc. This article is worth reading: | |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 12:42 on 14th September 2008 On 14th September 2008 05:17, Ruth Gregory wrote:
Thanks for the Elvis Presley links, Ruth. Made me grin! Do I have hope? Yes, I have many hopes. I have personal hopes that apply to various aspects of my life, and I have hopes for humanity and its journey towards self-knowledge. Sounds a bit high-flown - but I'm sure you know what I mean. We live in amazing times. Our knowledge of how the world works is expanding faster now than at any time in the past. Many things that were once a mystery are now understood in great detail, and you only have to look at the changes that have happened in the last 100 years to see that process in action. Assuming we don't blow ourselves to bits, I think 1000 years from now the world could be a much better place than it is today. Better, not because of religion, but because of increased knowledge, and the power such knowledge brings. I have hopes for that. Religion gives millions of people comfort. There's no doubt about that. And it's a very complex thing - the shared ritual, the companionship, the sense of belonging... I understand how powerful these things are. I found the following conversation, which you might find interesting: http://ask.metafilter.com/79801/How-do-secularists-deal-without-the-comfort-of-religion Regarding Lewis and his theology, the truth is I think all theology is a mess. I read somewhere that theology is: a deep, systematic, pedantic, intellectual, intelligent, insightful, thoughtful, uncompromising, objective, scientific analysis of a child's fairy tale. Analogous to the age old discussion of who's stronger, Superman or Spiderman? That seems to me to be close to the truth. Focusing on the problems with Lewis for a moment, the link I gave earlier discusses some of them, but here's a much fuller discussion of the weaknesses of his position: http://ffrf.org/books/lfif/?t=assertions | |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 12:42 on 14th September 2008 On 14th September 2008 05:17, Ruth Gregory wrote:
Thanks for the Elvis Presley links, Ruth. Made me grin! Do I have hope? Yes, I have many hopes. I have personal hopes that apply to various aspects of my life, and I have hopes for humanity and its journey towards self-knowledge. Sounds a bit high-flown - but I'm sure you know what I mean. We live in amazing times. Our knowledge of how the world works is expanding faster now than at any time in the past. Many things that were once a mystery are now understood in great detail, and you only have to look at the changes that have happened in the last 100 years to see that process in action. Assuming we don't blow ourselves to bits, I think 1000 years from now the world could be a much better place than it is today. Better, not because of religion, but because of increased knowledge, and the power such knowledge brings. I have hopes for that. Religion gives millions of people comfort. There's no doubt about that. And it's a very complex thing - the shared ritual, the companionship, the sense of belonging... I understand how powerful these things are. I found the following conversation, which you might find interesting: http://ask.metafilter.com/79801/How-do-secularists-deal-without-the-comfort-of-religion Regarding Lewis and his theology, the truth is I think all theology is a mess. I read somewhere that theology is: a deep, systematic, pedantic, intellectual, intelligent, insightful, thoughtful, uncompromising, objective, scientific analysis of a child's fairy tale. Analogous to the age old discussion of who's stronger, Superman or Spiderman? That seems to me to be close to the truth. Focusing on the problems with Lewis for a moment, the link I gave earlier discusses some of them, but here's a much fuller discussion of the weaknesses of his position: http://ffrf.org/books/lfif/?t=assertions | |
Cathy E. Posts: 8474 Joined: 15th Aug 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 13:30 on 14th September 2008 On 14th September 2008 11:40, John Ravenscroft wrote:
Thank you very much! | |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 14:25 on 14th September 2008
| |
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | On 14th September 2008 12:06, John Ravenscroft wrote: John, I noticed that you used two of Ruth's observations, 'Prayer is a paradox' being one of them, to validate your theory of Confirmation bias. I don't suppose you have ever really prayed in your life. I may be wrong. The long and short of all this convulated argument is that you or anyone else who bats for your team cannot possibly understand what it is to have a relationship with God. It is outside of molecules and atoms and cells and all things you can touch and feel and examine under a microscope. I also find militant atheism cold, without love. To make and drive home its (invalid) point it seeks to trample over the feelings, hopes and comforts of the believer.
| |
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | That should be 'convoluted'. I know what you clever bods think! |