Pictures of England

Search:

Historic Towns & Picturesque Villages

A picture of RyeBath AbbeyA picture of Bath AbbeyBag End?A picture of Barton Le ClayA picture of Barton Le Clay

Your thoughts on prayer 2

**Please support PoE by donating today - thank you**
 
poePremier Member - Click for more info
poe
Posts: 1132
Joined: 26th Oct 2003
Location: England
quotePosted at 10:36 on 14th September 2008
On 13th September 2008 00:58, Paul Hilton wrote:

 It does seem the modern trend today when refering to God as He/Him to write it in small letters as he/him. This constantly happened in the original prayers thread. I guess I'm old fashioned.


Hi Paul. I think it is a basic lack of understanding on my part as to exactly why people do that, and I never really gave it a thought as I was typing. I do apologise and hope I didn't come across as lacking respect.

Regarding my original question, here is a fun little video on youtube where they ask a group of children the same question -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ws_tVBf3OWg

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 11:40 on 14th September 2008
On 13th September 2008 19:29, Catherine England Schleunes wrote:
On 13th September 2008 18:22, John Ravenscroft wrote:

Me too, Catherine.

You look like a girl I knew when I was a student - and also like a colleague I used to work with. She taught Religious Education! 



Was that a compliment?


Well, Catherine - as they were both attractive women, I guess it is a complement! 

The student was called Catherine, too. The religious education teacher was called Helen, and believe it or not her surname was Moses! 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 11:44 on 14th September 2008
Excuse the spelling of compliment. This speech recognition software is fantastic - and the more I use it the better it gets - but it still makes the odd mistake.
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 12:06 on 14th September 2008
On 14th September 2008 04:58, Ruth Gregory wrote:
On 13th September 2008 09:48, John Ravenscroft wrote:

"Nothing fails like prayer." Anne Gaylor 
I'm sure prayer can have beneficial psychological effects on the person who is praying. Other forms of meditation can do the same kind of thing. But as I don't believe there's a God listening to your every word, and waiting to do whatever it is you want him to do, I find I have to agree with Anne Gaylor.  


Hi John:  Well, you and Anne Gaylor are missing the point of prayer.  Remember, God isn't a genie:

I got nothing that I asked for,

But everything I had hoped for.

Almost despite myself,

My unspoken prayers were answered.

I am among all men, most richly blessed.

 

Answer to Prayer is often a paradox, John.  And God answers in ways that we don't expect, notice of even want.  Often His care of us in answering is only noticed in hindsight.

 


Ruth, I'm sure you've heard of confirmation bias.

Confirmation bias is a form of selective thinking that focuses on evidence that supports what believers already believe while ignoring evidence that refutes their beliefs. Confirmation bias plays a stronger role when people base their beliefs upon faith, tradition and prejudice. For example, if someone believes in the power of prayer, the believer will notice the few "answered" prayers while ignoring the majority of unanswered prayers, or will say things like 'prayer is often a paradox' - God answers in ways we don't expect - his care of us is only noticed in hindsight etc.

This article is worth reading:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 12:42 on 14th September 2008
On 14th September 2008 05:17, Ruth Gregory wrote:

Two questions, John.

1)  Do you have hope?  I ask because when I think of atheism, it just seems so cold and clinical and seems to want to take hope away from those who believe in God by telling them they're foolish.  If atheists want to do good for their fellow man by warning them not to believe in something that's not true, and that something they believe in gives them hope, what would atheism offer them, in terms of hope, I mean?

2)  Why do you think Lewis' theology was a mess?


Thanks for the Elvis Presley links, Ruth. Made me grin! 
 
Do I have hope? Yes, I have many hopes. I have personal hopes that apply to various aspects of my life, and I have hopes for humanity and its journey towards self-knowledge. Sounds a bit high-flown - but I'm sure you know what I mean.
 
We live in amazing times. Our knowledge of how the world works is expanding faster now than at any time in the past. Many things that were once a mystery are now understood in great detail, and you only have to look at the changes that have happened in the last 100 years to see that process in action. Assuming we don't blow ourselves to bits, I think 1000 years from now the world could be a much better place than it is today. Better, not because of religion, but because of increased knowledge, and the power such knowledge brings. 
 
I have hopes for that. 
 
Religion gives millions of people comfort. There's no doubt about that. And it's a very complex thing - the shared ritual, the companionship, the sense of belonging... I understand how powerful these things are. I found the following conversation, which you might find interesting:
 
http://ask.metafilter.com/79801/How-do-secularists-deal-without-the-comfort-of-religion
 
Regarding Lewis and his theology, the truth is I think all theology is a mess. I read somewhere that theology is: a deep, systematic, pedantic, intellectual, intelligent, insightful, thoughtful, uncompromising, objective, scientific analysis of a child's fairy tale. Analogous to the age old discussion of who's stronger, Superman or Spiderman?  
  
That seems to me to be close to the truth.
 
Focusing on the problems with Lewis for a moment, the link I gave earlier discusses some of them, but here's a much fuller discussion of the weaknesses of his position:
 
http://ffrf.org/books/lfif/?t=assertions
 
 
 
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 12:42 on 14th September 2008
On 14th September 2008 05:17, Ruth Gregory wrote:

Two questions, John.

1)  Do you have hope?  I ask because when I think of atheism, it just seems so cold and clinical and seems to want to take hope away from those who believe in God by telling them they're foolish.  If atheists want to do good for their fellow man by warning them not to believe in something that's not true, and that something they believe in gives them hope, what would atheism offer them, in terms of hope, I mean?

2)  Why do you think Lewis' theology was a mess?


Thanks for the Elvis Presley links, Ruth. Made me grin! 
 
Do I have hope? Yes, I have many hopes. I have personal hopes that apply to various aspects of my life, and I have hopes for humanity and its journey towards self-knowledge. Sounds a bit high-flown - but I'm sure you know what I mean.
 
We live in amazing times. Our knowledge of how the world works is expanding faster now than at any time in the past. Many things that were once a mystery are now understood in great detail, and you only have to look at the changes that have happened in the last 100 years to see that process in action. Assuming we don't blow ourselves to bits, I think 1000 years from now the world could be a much better place than it is today. Better, not because of religion, but because of increased knowledge, and the power such knowledge brings. 
 
I have hopes for that. 
 
Religion gives millions of people comfort. There's no doubt about that. And it's a very complex thing - the shared ritual, the companionship, the sense of belonging... I understand how powerful these things are. I found the following conversation, which you might find interesting:
 
http://ask.metafilter.com/79801/How-do-secularists-deal-without-the-comfort-of-religion
 
Regarding Lewis and his theology, the truth is I think all theology is a mess. I read somewhere that theology is: a deep, systematic, pedantic, intellectual, intelligent, insightful, thoughtful, uncompromising, objective, scientific analysis of a child's fairy tale. Analogous to the age old discussion of who's stronger, Superman or Spiderman?  
  
That seems to me to be close to the truth.
 
Focusing on the problems with Lewis for a moment, the link I gave earlier discusses some of them, but here's a much fuller discussion of the weaknesses of his position:
 
http://ffrf.org/books/lfif/?t=assertions
 
 
 
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Cathy E.
Cathy E.
Posts: 8474
Joined: 15th Aug 2008
Location: USA
quotePosted at 13:30 on 14th September 2008
On 14th September 2008 11:40, John Ravenscroft wrote:
On 13th September 2008 19:29, Catherine England Schleunes wrote:
On 13th September 2008 18:22, John Ravenscroft wrote:

Me too, Catherine.

You look like a girl I knew when I was a student - and also like a colleague I used to work with. She taught Religious Education! 



Was that a compliment?


Well, Catherine - as they were both attractive women, I guess it is a complement! 

The student was called Catherine, too. The religious education teacher was called Helen, and believe it or not her surname was Moses! 


Thank you very much!
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 14:25 on 14th September 2008
Thank you very much!
 
You're welcome. 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
quote | editPosted at 23:37 on 14th September 2008
On 14th September 2008 12:06, John Ravenscroft wrote:


Hi John:  Well, you and Anne Gaylor are missing the point of prayer.  Remember, God isn't a genie:

I got nothing that I asked for,

But everything I had hoped for.

Almost despite myself,

My unspoken prayers were answered.

I am among all men, most richly blessed.

 

Answer to Prayer is often a paradox, John.  And God answers in ways that we don't expect, notice of even want.  Often His care of us in answering is only noticed in hindsight.

 


Ruth, I'm sure you've heard of confirmation bias.

Confirmation bias is a form of selective thinking that focuses on evidence that supports what believers already believe while ignoring evidence that refutes their beliefs. Confirmation bias plays a stronger role when people base their beliefs upon faith, tradition and prejudice. For example, if someone believes in the power of prayer, the believer will notice the few "answered" prayers while ignoring the majority of unanswered prayers, or will say things like 'prayer is often a paradox' - God answers in ways we don't expect - his care of us is only noticed in hindsight etc.

This article is worth reading:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias 

John, I noticed that you used two of Ruth's observations, 'Prayer is a paradox' being one of them, to validate your theory of Confirmation bias.  I don't suppose you have ever really prayed in your life. I may be wrong. The long and short of all this convulated argument is that you or anyone else who bats for your team cannot possibly understand what it is to have a relationship with God. It is outside of molecules and atoms and cells and all things you can touch and feel and examine under a microscope. I also find  militant atheism cold, without love. To make and drive home its (invalid) point it seeks to trample over the feelings, hopes and comforts of the believer.
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
quote | editPosted at 23:47 on 14th September 2008
That should be 'convoluted'. I know what you clever bods think!Wink
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions