Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
L Posts: 5656 Joined: 10th Jun 2004 Location: UK | quotePosted at 13:41 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 09:32, John Ravenscroft wrote:
I've already put some input into this thread,John but like I said earlier, I won't be adding to it anymore (bar this one of course lol) but have to say i'm with you! I do read the postings but I won't be drawn into any of them as I am the worlds most unreligeous person there is and I don't want to offend anyone regarding their beliefs, so i'm staying in this particular thread. |
Diana Sinclair Posts: 10119 Joined: 3rd Apr 2008 Location: USA | quotePosted at 13:46 on 16th September 2008 On 12th September 2008 23:56, poe wrote:
I am a bit late and a dollar short as they say () but I think this is an excellent question and I have been fascinated by the various answers I've read here. Great question POE! Although I am a Christian I have always been fascinated by ancient Judaism as well as by the Kabbalah. I tend to agree with the Kabbalists who envision two aspects of God. God himself who in the end is unknowable to us, and the "revealed" aspect of God, His light. As a Christian I believe that light is Yeshua the Christ. Since, from this understanding, Christ is the revealed God, I tend to picture sitting with him upon the Mount of Olives and having heart to heart conversations. Some might think that is blasphemous, but I intend no disrespect. To the contrary, I think that part of the reason that God chose to incarnate in the flesh was to give us a way to relate to him from a human perspective. |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 15:07 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 13:09, Catherine England Schleunes wrote:
I don't think you're being harsh Catherine - I didn't for one moment suppose you really thought I'm the devil. You said nothing wrong and nothing was taken the wrong way, so no problem. I don't think this conversation is getting carried away - it's just a little more robust than PoE is used to. Nothing wrong with that: robust conversation is good. |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 15:17 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 12:34, Sue Ryder wrote:
That creates a problem or two for people who say he's a loving God. |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 15:22 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 12:48, Sue Ryder wrote:
The Big Bang is the source. I'm looking forward to those Answers in Genesis extracts. |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 15:29 on 16th September 2008 G'day, everybody. 7:18 AM here, and now I think I'm going to be late for work. LOL. Andy, you mentioned 2 things that caught my eye - one, "Praying for peace just seems like such a contradiction to me," Why is that, Andy? The second is your last sentence - "Strength, courage, hope and love are lacking in the world these days." This is true, but it's also not true. It's only the blood and guts, murder and mayhem that make the papers or the 6 o'clock newscast. But there are millions of unsung heroes out there every day, who's stories, even if they make the papers, are overlooked because they're boring or not entertaining. You probably have seen such people in your travels and even among your own family and friends. And as for the "goodness" we attribute to ourselves - I think a lot of it has to do with the fact of where and when in history we came to be. A lot of the values we hold dear can be attributed to centuries of Christian thought that was able to take hold periodically. The Wilburforces, the Mother Theresa's, the Martin Luther King Jrs of the world and countless others had a worldview that originates in the gospels. And strength, courage, hope and love IS the message of the gospels. The word gospel means, "good news."
|
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | quotePosted at 15:30 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 13:41, Lyn Greenaway wrote:
The business about not offending any one when it comes to religious belief is interesting. Religious belief seems to be the only form of belief that one is automatically supposed to respect. We don't automatically respect a person's beliefs regarding music, politics, ethics, race etc. Beliefs like that are subjected to scrutiny - but for some reason that isn't supposed to happen with religious beliefs. |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 15:32 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 09:30, John Ravenscroft wrote:
|
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 15:34 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 09:30, John Ravenscroft wrote:
|
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | quotePosted at 15:37 on 16th September 2008 On 16th September 2008 13:29, Mick Bean wrote:
I agree with you on this one, Mick. God can't be proven scientifically and some scientists are able to square belief in God with scientific discoveries, and some can't. It's important not to pigeon-hole everybody.
|