Please login or click here to join.
Forgot Password? Click Here to reset pasword
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 12:19 on 6th September 2008 On 6th September 2008 00:19, Sue Gaffney-Ryder wrote:
This is the verse you refer to, Sue: 40:22 It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in... For a very full answer to your question, read this: http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/febible.htm Here's the specific comment on 40:22, but the entire article is worth reading. It shows that the bible assumes a flat earth, not a spherical one. Those who claim Biblical support for a spherical earth typically ignore this forest of consistency and focus on one or two aberrant trees. Some take refuge in audacity. Henry Morris, president of the Institute for Creation Research, cites one of the more explicitly flat-earth verses in the Old Testament Isaiah 40:22, the “grasshopper” verse quoted earlier as evidence for the sphericity of the earth. Quoting the King James version “he sitteth upon the circle of the earth” Morris ignores the context and the grasshoppers and claims “circle” should read “sphericity” or “roundness” [1956, 8]. This divide and conquer strategy is poor scholarship and worse logic. As for: I should have made myself clearer: How does scientific investigation undermine the bible. ... I hardly know where to start. There are literally hundreds of statements in the bible that are factually false. I'll highlight some of them in a later post. (We have friends coming and I have orders to clean the house - even with a broken arm! My wife knows no mercy.) |
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 14:06 on 6th September 2008 On 6th September 2008 03:52, Ruth Gregory wrote:
I've just read those verses, Ruth - and to be honest the thoughts that come from your 'puny brain' make far more sense than anything St Paul says here. I disagree with you that the quote is irrational, but rather than going into a big long discussion about it, let's just agree to disagree on this one, OK? We can certainly agree to disagree, but the difference is crucial and it won't go away. You think that quotation is rational - so it gives you what you feel is a rational reason for believing in God. I think the quotation is totally irrational, because it sets up an argument and then says: 'but that argument does not apply to God.' So it's just one more nail in the coffin of my disbelief. You and Sue both say that you believe humans are different in kind from other animals. That belief seems to me to be the product of simple vanity. We long to be special, we long to be chosen, we long to be the most important creatures in the universe. That longing explains an awful lot about the conflict between science and religion. Religion wants to put humanity at the centre of everything: science is constantly showing us that we are not at the centre of everything. We are animals. We share a common ancestor with every other animal on earth. We are special, but not because God chose us. We are special because we have a large, complex brain - and that's the result of evolution, not of some decision by God. (Thanks for the kind comments about my YouTube video, by the way. My brother has a great voice.) |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | Posted at 14:34 on 6th September 2008 On 6th September 2008 14:06, John Ravenscroft wrote:
You sound awfully sure of what you posted above, John. Almost as sure as I am about what I believe. This was in one of my daily devotionals called Living Faith. The writer is Fr. James Stephen Behrens. "God has written his law, his very self, into the heart of each person who has ever lived. God may seem far and his language hard to pin down. But remember that he writes on the heart. If you move through life with a generous measure of love, the text of God becomes all the more clear." One must make the leap, John, from the brain to the heart.
|
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 14:50 on 6th September 2008 I agree about keeping it light, Ruth - and I'm delighted that even though we disagree profoundly, we can do so in such a friendly fashion! The words of your daily devotional are very pretty, but they're also very vague. I try to 'move through life with a generous measure of love' - but that doesn't clarify God's text to me. It simply seems to be the best way of getting through three score years and ten - doing as much good (and as little harm) as possible. As for making the leap from the brain to the heart - I'm afraid my heart is a simple pump, Ruth. It's great at moving blood around my body, but when it comes to thinking, I go for the brain every time. |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | Posted at 14:56 on 6th September 2008 Now, John, you know I wasn't talking about the organ that pumps blood. As for words being vague, whether scripture, or commentary on it, the way I cut through the stuff that seems strange or contradictory or vague or not in keeping with what I perceive to be a loving God, that's where my prayer life comes in. I know I can't understand completely on my own. I ask for the grace to understand.
|
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | editPosted at 15:02 on 6th September 2008
We are special because we have a large, complex brain.... You can say that again, John! I read once that it has been described as the most complex thing in the Universe. There are still many mysteries yet to be discovered about it. Strange isn't it, to imagine the brain studying and examining itself. There is no vanity involved is believing we are special. It stands out a mile. Here I am talking about the ability to speak, (incredibly complex in itself) sing, paint, compose, construct, recall, plan, think ahead etc. etc. you get my meaning. I could go on and on! You call that evolution, I know it is from God. You can never disprove him. |
Ruth Gregory Posts: 8072 Joined: 25th Jul 2007 Location: USA | Posted at 15:07 on 6th September 2008 Hi Sue: LOVELY avatar! I take it that's one of your watercolors?
|
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 15:16 on 6th September 2008 Now, John, you know I wasn't talking about the organ that pumps blood. What does the word 'heart' mean to you in that context? I'm not being picky here: it's an important point. Many of your posts have indicated that I'll never appreciate what God means to you until I open up my heart to him. But what does that mean, Ruth? It seems to me to mean something like this: Abandon Reason. Accept things without evidence. Stop asking questions. Have Faith... Can you give me a clearer understanding of what you mean? |
Posts: Joined: 1st Jan 1970 | editPosted at 15:17 on 6th September 2008 LOL Ruth...I wish!!! No, I got this off a website I came across the other day.....wish you could read the words on the right hand side.! I will put up some of my paintings later....well everyone is changing theirs!
|
John Ravenscroft Posts: 321 Joined: 21st Sep 2007 Location: UK | Posted at 15:25 on 6th September 2008 On 6th September 2008 15:02, Sue Gaffney-Ryder wrote:
As I said before, if I tell you there is an invisible unicorn living on Mars - you can't disprove him, either! We can invent any supernatural being we like, say that He / She / It is the Creator of the Universe, and say we know with certainty that He / She / It exists. Nobody can ever disprove it. Millions of people who believed in Odin knew Odin was real. Millions of people who believed in Zeus knew Zeus was real. Millions of people who believe in the Christian God know God is real. What's the difference? |