Pictures of England

Search:

Historic Towns & Picturesque Villages

A picture of RyeBath AbbeyA picture of Bath AbbeyBag End?A picture of Barton Le ClayA picture of Barton Le Clay

Your thoughts on prayer 2

**Please support PoE by donating today - thank you**
 
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 08:19 on 20th September 2008
On 19th September 2008 19:05, Ruth Gregory wrote:
On 16th September 2008 19:24, John Ravenscroft wrote:

The claims of Jesus’ birth are no different from any of the other virgin birth legends. It doesn’t have any more evidence or appear to be any more likely. Why believe it over the others?

(I know you won't debate this - but I thought it was worth mentioning.) 


You're right John, Sue won't debate this and neither will I.  My answer to this is "So?" 

Yes, the virgin birth flies in the face of our understanding of reality, but believers are open to the possiblity that God can and does bring things about according to His will, that defy physical reality as we know it.  You could say the same thing about resurrection from the dead.  I only mention this, not to begin another dialogue about what Christians believe - these are the two bedrock beliefs of Christians - but to respond to what you posted, John. 


I don't think 'So?' addresses the question, Ruth.

 

In a previous post I mentioned some of the things that creationists believe in. Sue said that the only thing on the list she believed in was the Virgin Birth. 

If the idea of a Virgin Birth is present in many other myths - and it is - I think it's legitimate to ask Sue why she feels that this particular Virgin Birth has some kind of special status. Especially given the fact that most of the other Virgin Birth myths pre-date Christianity.

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
quotePosted at 08:46 on 20th September 2008
On 19th September 2008 19:18, Ruth Gregory wrote:
On 17th September 2008 11:06, John Ravenscroft wrote:
Someone sent me this link yesterday.
It's entitled 'Proving that Prayer is a Superstition.'
I've just watched it twice, and it seems to me to be quite convincing. Ruth and Sue, I'd be particularly interested in your thoughts on the video.


Hello again, John.  Smile

My opinion of that video is that it’s someone’s opinion.  Someone who dismisses the majority of the human race as not being “normal and intelligent.”  I suppose my question to him would be, “What’s it to you if others believe?”  And I suppose that’s my big question about atheists – they may be without hope, but why do they want to rob it from others?  I believe I’ve already stated my position on this earlier on, John.  I don’t believe that God is the genie in the sky, and believers don’t either.  Otherwise the whole world would be prospersous, happy and healhy.  And no one would ever die.  But death is a fact of life – we are all going to die, and death takes many forms – cancer, car crashes, freak accidents, and is no discriminator of persons – the wealthy and the poor, the powerful and the peasant, the believer and the non believer, we will all die some day.  We don’t know why some people get their miracles and some don’t.  Believers just trust that God is in control and that one day our questions will be answered in light of God who is pure love.

 

As for why it seems that the scriptures he cited are untrue – believers believe that God has a plan – a plan of creation, a plan of salvation.  He answers prayer according to His plan.  Why when believers get together and pray in Jesus name that someone be cured and they’re not.  I don’t know, I can only trust.  But there is a great difference in being “cured” and being “healed.”  Do you know that difference, John? 


Ruth, I don't think the guy who made that video wants to rob believers of hope. And if he's anything like me, I doubt very much that he lives his own life without hope of any kind. Remember, you asked me if I had hope and I gave you some examples of hopes that I cherish.

Most atheists have hopes - they just don't include the hope that they will live forever in some kind of heavenly paradise. 

As for why do atheists bother about the religious beliefs non-atheists hold - there are several reasons. An obvious reason is that religious beliefs can be dangerous. To see evidence of that, all you have to do is turn on the TV news.
 
A less obvious reason is that religion is the enemy of rational thought, and if anything is going to rescue humanity from the various dangers that face us, it's going to be rational thought. Not religion. Reason.
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
quote | editPosted at 22:45 on 20th September 2008
On 20th September 2008 08:46, John Ravenscroft wrote:

 


As for why do atheists bother about the religious beliefs non-atheists hold - there are several reasons. An obvious reason is that religious beliefs can be dangerous. To see evidence of that, all you have to do is turn on the TV news.
A less obvious reason is that religion is the enemy of rational thought, and if anything is going to rescue humanity from the various dangers that face us, it's going to be rational thought. Not religion. Reason.

Yes, John, religious beliefs can be dangerous. But are you saying that there are no killings and bloodshed in atheistic regimes?  What about Stalin and Pol Pot.?  Or Germany in WW2?  They thought it OK to experiment on their victims. They also believed in the survival of the fittest (and God help anyone who was looking a bit off-colour) measuring heads and noses and chins to establish the superiority of one race over another. Please don't use this argument because it holds no water at all.

It is unchristian beliefs that lead to the kind of things we see on the TV and has nothing to do with the real and living God.

A faith in God is not irrational to me. In fact you need look no further than our own country that has changed beyond recognition in the past 40 or so years. Stabbings and killings have become almost routine. They are ceasing to shock anymore. I think that has a lot to do with believing we are alone in an uncaring and cold universe. I wouldn't like to live in any of the big cities today. Survival of the fittest seems to be the name of the game. No one to answer to, no bigger picture. It has seeped into the judiciary , the media and the whole Establishment.

Jerimiah 8 v 9 : They have rejected the very word of God, and what wisdom do they have?



 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 23:07 on 20th September 2008

Great points, Sue.  Yes, John, I agree with Sue and have stated previously numerous times. the destructive power of religion gone bad.  I'm sorry if I pigeon-holed all atheists as being without hope or being uncaring.  And I'm sure that for many atheists, it's a genuine concern for the good of the world that makes them embrace reason over faith, especially given the history of religion.  But religion has its other side too, when it' not gone bad.  There are many people and have been many people who have made great sacrifices for the good of their fellow man, because they love God.  Not everyone can be Mother Teresa, but I believe it's the force of Christianity that has shaped the value system that you and I now enjoy.  Jesus' message was one of love.  And all religions have an element of love in them, but religion gone bad overlooks this - trying to enforce the letter of the law, at the expense of the spirit of the law.  Atheism gone bad is made manifest in what Sue described, which is just as chilling.  If all people of faith or no faith, of any religious pursuasion or no religious pursuasion would embrace "love thy neighbor as thyself," this conversation would be unnecessary and it would be a pretty wonderful world.

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 01:33 on 21st September 2008
On 20th September 2008 00:25, John Ravenscroft wrote:

Yikes!

There's a lot here to discuss - but it's late so I'll leave most of it until the morning.

However, I did want to respond to this, Ruth:

The piece I put up about Biblical interpretation is a Catholic perspective – the official church teaching is that the scriptures, while being the inspired Word of God, are not to be interpreted literally, but to be presented in light of the gospel message and using state of the art biblical criticism.  This utilizes translations taken from the oldest extant Greek and Hebrew texts, rather than the Latin vulgate, as well as scientific and archaeological evidence that can shed light on the original context of the writings. 

I'll respond with a brief video: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27pDmWOO73c&feature=related

Do you think Harris has a point or two, Ruth?


Yes, Harris makes a point or two about how much more we know today due to the scientific discoveries mankind has made over the centuries.  But church teaching is not that the scriptures were written by God, or dictated to a human scribe, but were written by various people writing through the lens of their own particular culture.  Of course the writers could not possilby have the knowledge we have today.  But then he makes the broad brush statement that he can take any book from a Barnes and Noble store and it will contain much more “wisdom” than anything the Bible has to say.  I don’t think so, John.  And there’s a huge difference between wisdom and knowledge.  As for cherry picking stories from scripture, as I said twice now, I believe. the Bible was written by very human authors throughout centuries as man’s understanding of God was evolving.  I don’t know why a lot of the “blood and guts” stories were accepted by the church as canon of scripture, especially because they are so foreign to our modern sensibilities.  But there were times throughout history when that was the culture.  And that’s when much of scripture was written.  Jesus took a lot of pains to reinterpret these scriptures – “You have heard it said….but I say to you……, etc.”  And the filter he used was love. 

 
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 01:50 on 21st September 2008
On 20th September 2008 08:19, John Ravenscroft wrote:

Yes, the virgin birth flies in the face of our understanding of reality, but believers are open to the possiblity that God can and does bring things about according to His will, that defy physical reality as we know it.  You could say the same thing about resurrection from the dead.  I only mention this, not to begin another dialogue about what Christians believe - these are the two bedrock beliefs of Christians - but to respond to what you posted, John. 


I don't think 'So?' addresses the question, Ruth.

 

In a previous post I mentioned some of the things that creationists believe in. Sue said that the only thing on the list she believed in was the Virgin Birth. 

If the idea of a Virgin Birth is present in many other myths - and it is - I think it's legitimate to ask Sue why she feels that this particular Virgin Birth has some kind of special status. Especially given the fact that most of the other Virgin Birth myths pre-date Christianity.

 


I can't speak for Sue, John, but I'll bet her answer is pretty close to mine, which I highlighted in red above.  As for why the Christian virgin-birth idea is better or more real than the others that pre-date Christianity - I don't know, honestly, apart from, after 2,000 years, that's the one that's still believed, perhaps because it arrived after man's concept of a creator.  That was huge, John, from the historical perspective.  An omnipotent creator who can and does create from nothing.  But that's what I believe.  What you refer to as presuppositions, John, I call faith.  And again, on the face of it, it's irrational, but like I said, reality can, and I believe, does exist outside the realm of our five senses. 

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 01:53 on 21st September 2008
On 20th September 2008 00:25, John Ravenscroft wrote:

Yikes!

There's a lot here to discuss



Now you know how I feel after I'm gone for a day or two.  But I love it!!!

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 04:16 on 21st September 2008

The original concept of the thread was your thoughts on prayer and in the beginning of the first thread everybody expressed their thoughts.  The discussion has taken some interesting turns, but bringing it back to prayer, I'd like to share a bit of a piece that sums up nicely what prayer has meant to so many throughout the ages - ancient wisdom that cannot be measured in any way, apart from results.  The piece is the introduction to a book called "Pocket Book of Prayers" by Jim Palmer.  He isn't the actual author - the book is an extensive compilation of prayers, some ancient, some new by many different people from various faith traditions - Catholic saints, Christian apologists, evangelical preachers, ancient prayer books, even monarchs and noblemen.  The prayer I put up in an earlier posting by Sir Francis Drake is from this book and Drake is not exactly known for being a theologian.  lol  I guess that's why the book attracted me - it was about Christian prayer in all its forms and expressions of faith from believers across the spectrum.

Palmer writes:  "There is a river that runs so true through the epic story of God's redemption of the world.  It is the enduring conversation between God and man - a river of prayer.  You can follow the river through the ages and across the continents through biblical records, Celtic oral traditions, monastic liturgies, spirituals and hymns, private journals and personal letters, and cathedral inscriptions.  Follow the river of prayer long enough and inevitably you will find yourself eavesdropping upon the intimate reflections of some of history's most pivotal people in situations that would shape their times.

The river winds along the rocky coasts of Ireland, where St. Patrick boldly called upon God's protection, around Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, where Martin Luther King, Jr. wrestled with God over the suffering of the civil-rights movement, through the villages of Calcutta, where Mother Teresa pleaded for divine assistance in caring for the needs of orphans; and along ground zero in New York City, where a young mother stands with twins in tow, seeking the strength of God to carry on.  It also runs alongside the spiritual pilgrimage of countless souls who sought to know, love and follow God and who discovered deep delight in the knowing and the loving and the following.

Throughout the ages, men and women have stood in the river by utilizing the prayers of others to give expression to their own hearts before God.  Whether it is seeking guidance amid confusion, courage in the face of fear, healing from heartaches, hope and peace in circumstances of despair, or a desire to know and experience God more deeply in your life, consider this book of prayers a sacred pathway for your daily journey of speaking and listening to God.

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 23:58 on 4th October 2008

We did a really cool thing at my church today.  In the Catholic tradition, today (Oct. 4) is the feast of St. Francis of Assissi.  St. Francis was a lover of animals and all of God's creation.  So our parish priest, who is a real dog nut, conducted a blessing of the animals on the church lawn.  All were invited to bring their pets.  We had music, prayer and then he blessed them and spinkled them all with holy water accompanied by his little pooch, who was also wearing a Roman collar.  lol.  It was great fun.  I took Denzil and my big cat Russ.  Denzil had a ball, but I don't think Russ thought of it as much of a blessing.  LOL.  And they now have St. Francis medals to wear on their collars.

Here are some pics of the event:

http://s536.photobucket.com/albums/ff328/ruthyg_photos/Blessing%20of%20the%20Animals/

In one of the pics, the little brown dog with the big smile is my little cheeky chappy Denzil.

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Ruth Gregory
Ruth Gregory
Posts: 8072
Joined: 25th Jul 2007
Location: USA
quotePosted at 00:04 on 5th October 2008

The blessing of the animals also included this old hymn.  Some of you might remember it.  When you watch the video, pay close attention to the images.  A lot of them remind me of either people or pictures on POE.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZfkUGiGzQE

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions