Pictures of England

Search:

Historic Towns & Picturesque Villages

A picture of RyeBath AbbeyA picture of Bath AbbeyBag End?A picture of Barton Le ClayA picture of Barton Le Clay

Your thoughts on prayer

**Please support PoE by donating today - thank you**
 
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 16:47 on 8th August 2008
On 8th August 2008 16:08, Diana Sinclair wrote:
I enjoy a good healthy and friendly debate John and I enjoy your comments. Keep them coming!Smile



Thank you, Diana!

By the way, the latest Dawkins TV prog is available in full here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4471435322910215458

Worth watching, in my opinion.

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
editPosted at 21:16 on 8th August 2008
On 8th August 2008 15:11, John Ravenscroft wrote:


Sue, evolution is a fact. Even Stephen J Gould (who you quoted above) agrees with that statement.

No serious scientist doubts the fact of evolution. Yes, there are arguments about the specific mechanisms of evolution - but the fact that it takes place is fully accepted and is hole-free.

 

This is a game of ping-pong, John!! I know Richard Dawkins and others want to present evolution as fact but it still remains a theory. I also commented that there are many scientists that don't sing from the same hymn sheet as our eminent professor. Presumably they have examined the same evidence.

Anyway, in the interests of balance, here is something that anyone with an open and unprejudicial mind might find most interesting.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Diana Sinclair
Diana Sinclair
Posts: 10119
Joined: 3rd Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posted at 21:48 on 8th August 2008

Has anyone read the book or seen the PBS showing of "The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life?" It was excellent in my opinion. Here is a link if anyone is interested:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 23:07 on 8th August 2008
On 8th August 2008 21:16, Sue Gaffney-Ryder wrote:
On 8th August 2008 15:11, John Ravenscroft wrote:


Sue, evolution is a fact. Even Stephen J Gould (who you quoted above) agrees with that statement.

No serious scientist doubts the fact of evolution. Yes, there are arguments about the specific mechanisms of evolution - but the fact that it takes place is fully accepted and is hole-free.

 

This is a game of ping-pong, John!! I know Richard Dawkins and others want to present evolution as fact but it still remains a theory. I also commented that there are many scientists that don't sing from the same hymn sheet as our eminent professor. Presumably they have examined the same evidence.

Anyway, in the interests of balance, here is something that anyone with an open and unprejudicial mind might find most interesting.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee


Sue, thanks for the link to that website. I've spent a fascinating hour or so reading various sections of it, and I hope I read with an open mind. I certainly tried to.

But when I read this:

No apparent, perceived, or claimed interpretation of evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record...

I had to conclude that the people who run that site can't possibly claim to have minds that are 'open and unprejudicial'.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/about/faith

They also say the following:

Those who do not believe in Christ are subject to everlasting conscious punishment, but believers enjoy eternal life with God.

That's me in eternal hot water, then! 

  
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Sue H
Sue H
Posts: 8172
Joined: 29th Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posted at 23:44 on 8th August 2008
On 8th August 2008 23:07, John Ravenscroft wrote:

They also say the following:

Those who do not believe in Christ are subject to everlasting conscious punishment, but believers enjoy eternal life with God.

That's me in eternal hot water, then! 

  

On the contrary John. It's the people who make statements like this that are in eternal hot water, not you. And I say that as a Christian.

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions


Posts:
Joined: 1st Jan 1970
editPosted at 00:08 on 9th August 2008

John, please try and ignore the 'religious' element here. I don't believe in eternal damnation, either.

I could, if I decided to look, quote  equally hardline and dismissive words from Richard Dawkins. He is as adamant of his 'truth' as they are of theirs.  Personally, (though disregarding the eternal punishment) I found my beliefs strengthened when I came across this website. It is a thorough as any evolutionary angle. The bigger picture, to me, is that when you and me, and Richard Dawkins have cast off this mortal coil, the greater part of humanity will continue in their belief and love of our Creator.

In St Paul's Cathedral, the monument to Christopher Wren reads something like "If you seek his memorial, look around you."

I look around me, and into the night sky, it's not a memorial though, but a testament to a power my mind cannot even begin to imagine.

We will have to agree to differ, John.Smile 

 

 

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 00:34 on 9th August 2008
On 8th August 2008 21:48, Diana Sinclair wrote:

Has anyone read the book or seen the PBS showing of "The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life?" It was excellent in my opinion. Here is a link if anyone is interested:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/


Not read or seen that one, Diana.

I did read C S Lewis' Mere Christianity many years ago - and long before that I loved his Narnia books. In fact it was The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe that first got me into reading.

Sue H - thanks for that! Mind you, I quite like it hot! Wink

We will have to agree to differ, John.Smile  Fair enough, Sue G-R. As I said, I just like discussing this stuff. Keeps the brain-cogs turning! Thanks for playing!

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Shirley K. Lawson
Shirley K. Lawson
Posts: 2310
Joined: 17th Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posted at 00:43 on 9th August 2008
On 8th August 2008 16:47, John Ravenscroft wrote:
On 8th August 2008 16:08, Diana Sinclair wrote:
I enjoy a good healthy and friendly debate John and I enjoy your comments. Keep them coming!Smile



Thank you, Diana!

By the way, the latest Dawkins TV prog is available in full here:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4471435322910215458

Worth watching, in my opinion.


 Yes, this is interesting and even more so is the myths of yore, and rather they were real...or an species of imagination of the spirit realms. I think our own playing around with genetics and cloning and even husbandry of the past goes to show you that we do indeed "evolve" in many cases. I think it's going to be an stand still of middle line case forever. Indeed it is that as far as we know we were made in the image of "God" and different then say an bird, at least for now...but if you go to the Native Ameircan Shaman,..they talk differently then what they merely see by way of physical looks.  I remember the first time I was told I was I had an "eagle" for an totem animal.  I was much into understanding the concept back then. OK...and what makes you say that I said...they said...look at your life as it is "naturally...hum...you have one child, most "Eagles" seldom have mroe then two chicks, they mate for life..hwo long you ben married...hum over 40 years..didnt' you say you wereborn in June, that makes you an "air" sign doesn't it?...well I guess it does and on went this conversation...until I understood what an "totem" is. I am an "eagle" I do beleive now. I liked his saying that we are all an tree and we branched off in the years into different species of the same tree perhaps.I am though somewhat beleiveing strongly in "God" and I am learning that there are an myrid ways of doing that also.  

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
John Ravenscroft
John Ravenscroft
Posts: 321
Joined: 21st Sep 2007
Location: UK
Posted at 07:49 on 9th August 2008

I am though somewhat beleiveing strongly in "God" and I am learning that there are an myrid ways of doing that also.  

I certainly agree with that, Shirley.

I've had many, many chats with different religious folks and found that, when you dig a little below the surface, they all believe in different Gods!

My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions
Diana Sinclair
Diana Sinclair
Posts: 10119
Joined: 3rd Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posted at 16:00 on 9th August 2008
On 9th August 2008 00:34, John Ravenscroft wrote:
On 8th August 2008 21:48, Diana Sinclair wrote:

Has anyone read the book or seen the PBS showing of "The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life?" It was excellent in my opinion. Here is a link if anyone is interested:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/


Not read or seen that one, Diana.

I did read C S Lewis' Mere Christianity many years ago - and long before that I loved his Narnia books. In fact it was The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe that first got me into reading.

John, what makes this documentary so interesting is that (as I am sure you know) Freud was an atheist and I think that the book as well as the PBS broadcast did a spectacular job at presenting both side of the coin so to speak, without coming out in favor of either side over the other.  It simply presented the argument and left the readers/viewers to come to their own conclusions.
My favourite: Pictures  |  Towns  |  Attractions